AI Art is Theft: Labour, Extraction, and Exploitation Or, On the Dangers of Stochastic Pollocks

Check out the paper

• AI Art is Theft: Labour, Extraction, and Exploitation Or, On the Dangers of Stochastic Pollocks Trystan S. Goetze

Abstract

Since the launch of applications such as DALL•E, Midjourney, and Stable Diffusion, generative artificial intelligence has been controversial as a tool for creating artwork. Some writers have presented worries about these technologies as harbingers of fully automated futures to come, but more pressing is the impact of generative AI on creative labour in the present. Already, business leaders have begun replacing human artistic labour with AI-generated images. In response, the artistic community has launched a protest movement, which argues that AI image generation is a kind of theft. This paper analyzes, substantiates, and critiques these arguments, concluding that AI image generators involve an unethical kind of labour theft. If correct, many other AI applications also rely upon theft.

Check out the slides

PDF here.